Rifle Powder Burn Rate Chart
Rifle Powder Burn Rate Chart - The reason your rifle shoots the 180s so well is the 1 in 10 twist. It is also the same twist as the m1 garand. Quite accurate at perry in an '03 rifle. The range you quote is not quite correct. I think something like 33 gr. Of powder and a 172 gr.
But, while the initial load was hot (powder used was wc750), the reason the change was made was not for pressure reasons, but rather because the marines complained that the ammo didn't match the bdc in their unertl scopes. The range you quote is not quite correct. The reason your rifle shoots the 180s so well is the 1 in 10 twist. I hear other powders recommended all the time that are listed on the burn charts as slower than varget. Easy on barrel and shoulder.
I can find no conclusive evidence to support the claim that varget has a burning rate that is too slow for use in the m1a. I think something like 33 gr. I have yet to hear of a report of a rifle being damaged from using varget. Bullet, can't remember which, one of the guys will chime in. When the.
Bullet, can't remember which, one of the guys will chime in. There was a change shortly after m118lr initially came out (1998 production year) when winchester/olin ran the lake city plant. Easy on barrel and shoulder. I can find no conclusive evidence to support the claim that varget has a burning rate that is too slow for use in the.
But, while the initial load was hot (powder used was wc750), the reason the change was made was not for pressure reasons, but rather because the marines complained that the ammo didn't match the bdc in their unertl scopes. The range you quote is not quite correct. The reason your rifle shoots the 180s so well is the 1 in.
I think something like 33 gr. Easy on barrel and shoulder. Bullet, can't remember which, one of the guys will chime in. When the garand was developed the round in use, m1 ball had either a 173 or a 190 gr. It is also the same twist as the m1 garand.
It is also the same twist as the m1 garand. Easy on barrel and shoulder. I have yet to hear of a report of a rifle being damaged from using varget. Quite accurate at perry in an '03 rifle. I think something like 33 gr.
Rifle Powder Burn Rate Chart - The reason your rifle shoots the 180s so well is the 1 in 10 twist. The range you quote is not quite correct. It is also the same twist as the m1 garand. Quite accurate at perry in an '03 rifle. I think something like 33 gr. But, while the initial load was hot (powder used was wc750), the reason the change was made was not for pressure reasons, but rather because the marines complained that the ammo didn't match the bdc in their unertl scopes.
It is also the same twist as the m1 garand. I have yet to hear of a report of a rifle being damaged from using varget. Bullet, can't remember which, one of the guys will chime in. Of powder and a 172 gr. I think something like 33 gr.
Of Powder And A 172 Gr.
I think something like 33 gr. The range you quote is not quite correct. Easy on barrel and shoulder. When the garand was developed the round in use, m1 ball had either a 173 or a 190 gr.
There Was A Change Shortly After M118Lr Initially Came Out (1998 Production Year) When Winchester/Olin Ran The Lake City Plant.
But, while the initial load was hot (powder used was wc750), the reason the change was made was not for pressure reasons, but rather because the marines complained that the ammo didn't match the bdc in their unertl scopes. The reason your rifle shoots the 180s so well is the 1 in 10 twist. I have yet to hear of a report of a rifle being damaged from using varget. I hear other powders recommended all the time that are listed on the burn charts as slower than varget.
I Can Find No Conclusive Evidence To Support The Claim That Varget Has A Burning Rate That Is Too Slow For Use In The M1A.
Quite accurate at perry in an '03 rifle. It is also the same twist as the m1 garand. Bullet, can't remember which, one of the guys will chime in.